Johann Hari: You are being lied to about pirates
Some are clearly just gangsters. But others are trying to stop illegal dumping and trawling
Monday, 5 January 2009
Who imagined that in 2009, the world's governments would be declaring a new War on Pirates? As you read this, the British Royal Navy – backed by the ships of more than two dozen nations, from the US to China – is sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains. They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most broken countries on earth. But behind the arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an untold scandal. The people our governments are labelling as "one of the great menaces of our times" have an extraordinary story to tell – and some justice on their side.
Pirates have never been quite who we think they are. In the "golden age of piracy" – from 1650 to 1730 – the idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage Bluebeard that lingers today was created by the British government in a great propaganda heave. Many ordinary people believed it was false: pirates were often saved from the gallows by supportive crowds. Why? What did they see that we can't? In his book Villains Of All Nations, the historian Marcus Rediker pores through the evidence.
If you became a merchant or navy sailor then – plucked from the docks of London's East End, young and hungry – you ended up in a floating wooden Hell. You worked all hours on a cramped, half-starved ship, and if you slacked off, the all-powerful captain would whip you with the Cat O' Nine Tails. If you slacked often, you could be thrown overboard. And at the end of months or years of this, you were often cheated of your wages.
Pirates were the first people to rebel against this world. They mutinied – and created a different way of working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates elected their captains, and made all their decisions collectively, without torture. They shared their bounty out in what Rediker calls "one of the most egalitarian plans for the disposition of resources to be found anywhere in the eighteenth century".
They even took in escaped African slaves and lived with them as equals. The pirates showed "quite clearly – and subversively – that ships did not have to be run in the brutal and oppressive ways of the merchant service and the Royal Navy." This is why they were romantic heroes, despite being unproductive thieves.
The words of one pirate from that lost age, a young British man called William Scott, should echo into this new age of piracy. Just before he was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina, he said: "What I did was to keep me from perishing. I was forced to go a-pirateing to live." In 1991, the government of Somalia collapsed. Its nine million people have been teetering on starvation ever since – and the ugliest forces in the Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to steal the country's food supply and dump our nuclear waste in their seas.
Yes: nuclear waste. As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died.
Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the UN envoy to Somalia, tells me: "Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead, and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury – you name it." Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to "dispose" of cheaply. When I asked Mr Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: "Nothing. There has been no clean-up, no compensation, and no prevention."
At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia's seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish stocks by overexploitation – and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300m-worth of tuna, shrimp, and lobster are being stolen every year by illegal trawlers. The local fishermen are now starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka 100km south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: "If nothing is done, there soon won't be much fish left in our coastal waters."
This is the context in which the "pirates" have emerged. Somalian fishermen took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least levy a "tax" on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coastguard of Somalia – and ordinary Somalis agree. The independent Somalian news site WardheerNews found 70 per cent "strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defence".
No, this doesn't make hostage-taking justifiable, and yes, some are clearly just gangsters – especially those who have held up World Food Programme supplies. But in a telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali: "We don't consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas." William Scott would understand.
Did we expect starving Somalians to stand passively on their beaches, paddling in our toxic waste, and watch us snatch their fish to eat in restaurants in London and Paris and Rome? We won't act on those crimes – the only sane solution to this problem – but when some of the fishermen responded by disrupting the transit-corridor for 20 per cent of the world's oil supply, we swiftly send in the gunboats.
The story of the 2009 war on piracy was best summarised by another pirate, who lived and died in the fourth century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander the Great, who demanded to know "what he meant by keeping possession of the sea." The pirate smiled, and responded: "What you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are called emperor." Once again, our great imperial fleets sail – but who is the robber?
Post a comment
Limit: 1000 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by Independent.co.uk's Terms of Use
- Next Article In Johann Hari
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
109 Comments
RJD, how can i trust mr hari's article if he can get the most basic facts wrong. Its a question of credability and im afraid he aint got none.
Posted by unhappy jon | 09.01.09, 12:25 GMT
If piracy is the real issue, then history provides a solution: the convoy system.
Posted by David J | 09.01.09, 12:02 GMT
Of course, its out of the question that Indian, Pakistani or SE Asian criminal gangs could be behind the dumping of toxic waste in East African waters. Only those horrible white faced neo colonial Europeans could possibly do something so beastly. lets face it, the west has not, and can not ever do anything right.
Posted by Matt | 09.01.09, 00:41 GMT
Er, why would boats rush in to Somalian waters to dump waste when the vast majority of the oceans are international waters where anything can be dumped any time? Doesn't make sense and smacks of BS made up by the pirates to justify their activities. Do some research my friend, repeating hearsay is hardly good journalism
Posted by George | 08.01.09, 21:49 GMT
Tony, in case you haven't noticed, Hari quotes a UN official speaking last week, saying nuclear dumping +is+ happening.
Posted by Jules | 08.01.09, 20:29 GMT
So they're like the famous five ?
Posted by ACH Melchett | 08.01.09, 20:12 GMT
Actually, the Economist Jan. 3 - 9 has a special report on the alarming loss of fish species due to a combination of unexplained sea changes and some directly attributed to pollution and overfishing. Spain, Ireland and Japan are named as the worst when it comes to trawling and using methods that clearly cause great harm. And, the Economist also claims that European countries are moving into African waters which are pooly policed. I cannot speak of the dumping but the trawling in African waters such as Somalia by Europeans and Japanese is a claim levied by a creditable source. So, sorry mate this is not one of those blame the West stories. I'm always amazed at the persistence of Western myths as altruistic beacons of virtue rather than the savage and rapacious looters that Africans and other former colonial vassals can attest to.
Posted by drew | 08.01.09, 19:49 GMT
If the people are dying from radiation and pollution why are the fish unharmed....?
Posted by Fulke | 08.01.09, 17:25 GMT
Twiggins, to answer question 3 about submarines:
The biggest problem with anti-piracy work is finding the pirates. This means that you need air cover, which means long-range planes from friendly bases (few and far between) or helicopters from destroyers and frigates.
Then take a look at the size of the ships the pirates are using. They're rarely more than 20 feet long. Torpedoes would be ineffective on such a target.
Next, destroyers and frigates carry Marines, who are trained for shipboard combat. Submarines don't have this and would be ineffective at the kind of boarding operations required, due to their shape.
Finally, there's a risk that small arms or RPGs fired at a submarine hull could damage its ability to submerge.
Posted by Russell Long | 08.01.09, 17:16 GMT
RJD,
Johann Hari has not committed 'minor historical inaccuracies' with his description of naval life. He has committed glaring errors that would not be out of place in a primary school.
If he is incapable of ensuring that he is correct in this area - and nothing he said about life in the Royal Navy from 17th-19th centuries was right - how can we possibly trust him to be accurate on anything else?
Posted by Russell Long | 08.01.09, 17:12 GMT
109 Comments