Manipulation of the Gold Price
- Details
- Category: Global Perspectives
- Published on Monday, 24 September 2012 08:06
- Written by Jeff Thomas
By Jeff Thomas, International Man
There is much discussion these days as to whether the price of gold is being manipulated. The answer is simply "yes."
It is likely that most potential gold investors would agree that the major financial institutions have the ability to influence the gold price. They would also agree that to do so would be of benefit to those institutions. Yet, many investors still have difficulty making the final leap to agree that, if the institutions can manipulate the gold price and, by doing so, will profit from it, they will actually manipulate the price. Odd, as this would seem to me to be the easiest of the three premises to accept.
However, there are also many investors who do believe that manipulation exists. From time to time, investors have commented to me, "I don't know how they're going about it, but I'm sure it's being done."
This view suggests that the method of manipulation is difficult to understand.
Much of the manipulations that financial institutions perform are complex and confusing to those who are not involved in the industry, and this is intentional. The muddier the waters, the less transparent the activities are.
So, let's take away the detail and express one common method of gold price manipulation in simple terms:
Bullion banks generally hold only a small percentage of what they sell. Banks claim to hold 10%, but a real number may be as low as 1%. This is possible because most buyers keep the gold stored in the bank where they bought it. All the buyer really has is a piece of paper stating that the gold exists in the bank and is being held for him.
As the economy worsens, the price of gold will rise. The worse the economy is, the greater the fear of owning fiat currencies. The greater this fear is, the greater the demand to hold gold. The greater the demand, the more the price goes up.
As the price of gold rises, the banks will make periodic moves to cause it to drop. They will make an offering of more gold for sale (which, again, they do not possess). Like any commodity, the more there is on the market at any given time, the lower the price will be. Thus, the price is forced down by the banks, collectively.
The manipulation is made possible due to the fact that what has been sold does not exist. The regularity of manipulation is unlimited, as the bank is only buying a fraction of the gold it sells. As long as the bank's clients are willing to invest in "paper" gold, the price may always be driven down, due to new "sales."
Of course, this charade cannot go on forever. Eventually, the buyers realise what is being done and will then demand delivery of their gold. This will bring about two major events: a crash in the paper gold market and a dramatic increase in the price of physical gold.
The Crash of Paper Gold
Here is an assessment of how this is likely to play out:
The demand for allocated gold increases. Traditionally, a large portion of gold investment has been in ETFs and similar methods. As more investors get word of rumours that banks are actually holding only a small fraction of the gold that has been sold, they will decide only to buy if the gold is "allocated"; that is, that specific numbered bars or specific boxes of coins are being held for the buyer. (This trend already exists and is becoming more prevalent.) At this point, there is no panic, as the allocated gold simply replaces the ETFs. The amount of money invested in gold with the banks overall remains about the same.
Fear increases that allocated gold is no safer than ETFs. Rumours surface that the "allocated" gold does not exist. Either it never existed, or it has been sold without advising the owner. (This stage has also begun.)
Investors begin to lose faith in the banks. Holders of allocated gold show up at the bank, demanding to view their gold. They will be shown a portion of the gold that the bank actually holds. Some owners will recognise that what they have been shown is not the gold that had been allocated (incorrect serial numbers). The owners may then demand to withdraw their gold from the bank. (This has begun in a small way in London, Zurich and other European centres, but is, at present, a rarity.) As rumours spread of the above, an increasing number of owners will show up at their banks to view their gold and will demand to withdraw it.
The ability of the banks to deliver gold on demand breaks down. At some point, a given bank will have to deliver more than it has in its vaults, as very little of what has been sold exists. That bank will then fail to provide the gold to the owner on that given day. As more banks reach this point, rumours become rampant.
There is a run on the banks. As word gets around that banks are failing to deliver, owners panic and make demands upon the banks en masse. In a very short space of time, all the bullion banks in the world who rely on a fractional reserve system will fail to deliver, and the paper gold industry will end abruptly.
The above scenario is not merely a possibility; it is a near-certainty. It may be argued that if one bank cannot deliver, it may quickly ask the bank across the street to cover for it by loaning it their gold. But, at some point, the demand for delivery exceeds what the banks can collectively deliver, and a crash is inevitable. It is only a question of when.
It is important to understand that this last stage will happen very quickly. No one will be able to predict the day on which it will occur.
When it occurs, the paper gold crash will send a shock wave around the world. It is well-known that the world's banks are building up their own inventories of gold, and these are kept separate from what they owe the buyers of allocated gold. It remains to be seen whether the banks will be ordered by the various governments to deliver their own gold to the owners, but this seems unlikely when we observe the many cases in which banks are allowed to fail to compensate their clients whist walking away with large sums themselves.
The Climb of the Gold Price
So, then, what happens to the price of gold at this point? Clearly, it would become obvious overnight that the amount of gold that had been sold greatly exceeded that which has ever been mined in the course of history. Yet, the pre-existing level of demand for gold certainly would still exist, and even increase. Whilst some of the owners of paper gold have now been wiped out and cannot purchase more, the demand will increase, as those investors who still have cash come to be more aware of how finite gold is. In fact, that very quality will assure an increase in demand following the crash.
With the increased demand will be a predictably increased price. But there will be a second reason for increased price: the elimination of the price manipulation due to the sale of non-existent gold. Gold, once free of its primary form of manipulation, will experience greater and more regular increases in price, which will introduce the mania stage of gold's rise.
Ten years ago, those of us who predicted a gold mania needed to be careful what we predicted. Back then, I commented to a lunch group that I believed within ten years we should expect to see gold as high as $1500. At the time (gold was around $300), this projection seemed, on the surface of it, to be ludicrous. A friend in the group, the senior partner of an accounting firm, looked at me with derision and said, "What have you been smoking?" At the time, I didn't have the courage to state that I additionally anticipated a subsequent mania that would eclipse the $1500 price. (At that time, I didn't have a firm picture in mind as to what the eventual high of the mania would be and, to be truthful, I still don't, although forecasters whom I respect have predicted $3500, $6000, $10,200 and $18,000.)
Today, $1500 gold is old hat, yet most people still doubt that a mania stage will occur. In fact, as a result of the length of time since the drop from $1900, an increasing number of pundits are predicting that the gold bull market is over, and that the price will soon head further south.
However, if the above supposition regarding a paper gold crash is correct, this event will most assuredly usher in a mania stage (if no other event does so first). It could occur in a year or two, but it could also occur tomorrow. All that is needed is enough fear in the market for a small percentage of those who hold paper gold to call in their chits.
Therefore, for any investor whose gold is held in any way by others (ETFs, allocated gold in a bank, physical gold in a bank safe deposit box), he would be well-advised to take delivery as soon as possible, if he is to be assured of actual ownership.
If you enjoyed this article, you might like our complimentary report, The Best of Jeff Thomas. Pulling no punches, Jeff shares his thoughts on the greatest threat to gold ownership, finding a bolthole on a budget, as well as the coming hyperinflation. You may download this report immediately in our member's area. If you are not a member, you can join here.
[If you're going to successfully internationalize - whether assets, income or personally - you'll need some good resources to do it. Join us at the International Man Network and gain access to our library of useful reports on a wide range of diversification topics from moving gold overseas or finding an international broker to getting set up on the ground in a number of different countries around the world. Click here for more information.]

Gene Braeger
Posted at 2012-09-24 18:59:19
At the end of any analysis, even a fine, intelligent analysis like this one, it is important to include the final probability which is large. That probability is that government will seize gold, or outlaw it, and/or peg the price and forbid transactions at a higher price. Of course, then comes the black market. I would like to see Jeff include this likelihood in his well-written analysis. Then we'll have the whole picture to consider.

Herb
Posted at 2012-09-26 03:14:16
When is anarchy finally going to prevail on those numbnuts mofo banksters.If we went into a bank and tried to rob it we'd get 10 years hard labor if we didn't get shot in the head,but,those weezlin' pricks rob the middle class,the savers,the elderly,and the youth out of their hopes and dreams and they not only don't do time they get bailed out.STAND UP AND BUY PHYSICAL PM'S AND GO GET "EM.

Posted at 2012-09-24 20:13:50
So are you saying that a service like GoldMoney which says it does audited allocated storage of client gold is really allocating the gold several times over? How are they getting pass the auditing?
Sounds like you are suggesting that personal holding of gold coins and bars or storage at an offshore storage location (not a bank) is best. Is that right?
Paul
Posted at 2012-09-24 22:31:29
So are you saying that a service like GoldMoney which says it does audited allocated storage of client gold is really allocating the gold several times over? How are they getting pass the auditing?
Sounds like you are suggesting that personal holding of gold coins and bars or storage at an offshore storage location (not a bank) is best. Is that right?
Goldmoney (James Turk & Son) are honest and reliable as best as I can tell. I would trust them. They do not allocate gold several times over. All is audited carefully. What you own is allocated to you.
Peter Trzaska
Posted at 2012-09-25 23:43:46
Hahahaha. MF Global, PFG, JPM, LIBOR, Barclays, Goldman Sachs, Exchange Stabilization Fund... You have to open your eyes!! Turk is not going to advise you his allocated Gold Bullion has been allocated, rehypothecated, rehypothecated cubed. Who will then pour into his fraudulent fund?! You just can not afford to be as naive as you so clearly are... unless you have money to burn, or more specifically..uless you have money to buy paper gold claims which, I guarantee you, WILL burn. And, moreover, which were invented and designed to burn. You want to know how they fool you. Check this blog out. preciousmetalspete.blogspot.co.uk/
This article, Jeff Thomas' current knowledge of Gold, barely scratches the surface. But you can learn and, by so doing, outrun those determined to watch their paper gold claims go up in smoke. The blog above is a great place to start!
So are you saying that a service like GoldMoney which says it does audited allocated storage of client gold is really allocating the gold several times over? How are they getting pass the auditing?
Sounds like you are suggesting that personal holding of gold coins and bars or storage at an offshore storage location (not a bank) is best. Is that right?
Goldmoney (James Turk & Son) are honest and reliable as best as I can tell. I would trust them. They do not allocate gold several times over. All is audited carefully. What you own is allocated to you.

thomas
Posted at 2012-09-24 20:26:29
Central banks are in the business of printing money and if the public loses confidence in fiat currency Central banks are finished. However Central banks hold enough physical gold to crash prices every now and then and thy will do so in order not to go out of business. Gold will be allowed to rise by 10% to 1% per year which does not cause a problem to Central banks, but no more than that. Forecasts of gold at $ 5000 ,etc are just rubbish since they assume that Central banks will exist no more.

Fred
Posted at 2012-09-24 23:03:05
In principle I agree with your viewpoint, but have some reservations: Your scenario only lasts as long as Central Banks'ters can continue with their "fiat currency" scam. Eventually, as throughout history, ALL paper-money reverts to zero (first due to gradual, then eventually due to hyper-inflation) -- just like a dying star going 'nova', when its core starts making 'iron' atoms. FYI, this is a process that consumes far more energy than it creates.
The US experiment of fiat-money is now 41 years old (8/15/1971), and approaching the end of a "Kondratieff cycle". E.g. see http://kondratieffwinter.com/blog/
I suspect/predict that when the Bond market tanks (interest rates go up), the dominos will start falling, in a Perfect Storm monetary and fiscal environment. I have friends on "Wall St" in NY, London, Toronto, and they ALL say that "QE will end badly. Very Badly. As in 'Far worse than 2008'." Publicly though, they "tow the party line" of their respective employers, while they're packing their parachutes with real, hard assets (money-generating property, commodities, precious metals, healthier fiat currencies).
AgAuMoney
Posted at 2012-09-25 20:39:07
Gold will be allowed to rise by 10% to 1% per year which does not cause a problem to Central banks, but no more than that. Forecasts of gold at $ 5000 ,etc are just rubbish since they assume that Central banks will exist no more.
10%? If that were true then gold would still be under $900/oz. Seems like they have only been able to hold it barely under 17% per year. At this rate we should cross $5000 before 2020.

Adam Smith
Posted at 2012-09-24 21:28:33
I agree, but tell all that to Doug Casey or any of the editors at CR. They have the hard line that there is no manipulation. Editorial policy?

Posted at 2012-09-25 20:40:33
Not all those at Casey believe there is no manipulation. Ed Steer is one. But I agree, Doug Casey himself sees intrigue and conspiracy everywhere (he's mostly correct), and distrusts government everywhere (again correct), except in the gold market (where he's dead wrong.) Casey is a mystery -- a bright guy, but spends his time going on and on about his personal views that the world is manipulated and everyone is screwed, but just not in the gold market.

Fred
Posted at 2012-09-24 22:40:16
What is your take on KITCO's Pool Accounts, which are allegedly audited, etc. Even so, does an "audit" truly verify that NO double or multiple booking (on or off books) occurs for the same gold lots? Call me sceptical.

Hucklebuck
Posted at 2012-09-26 01:50:39
By definition, a "pool account" is not allocated metal.

Frank
Posted at 2012-09-24 23:20:28
What dovetails nicely into this 'Gold Rules' ('golden rules'?) is a discussion on Capital Accounts a few days ago, this time with James Rickards (of "Currency Wars" fame):
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QPjI5OtCjg&feature=g-all-u
Harry
Posted at 2012-09-25 00:08:08
Some on CNBC say that "Bernanke is now a Kamikaze pilot"
www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-09-24/kaminsky-bernanke-now-kamikaze-pilot
If so, AU (symbol for gold) makes sense. But, given that the 'spread' (fees between buying & selling) is much bigger for hard bullion than for pool accounts of bullion or for ETF's, perhaps it makes sense to hold a mixed bag? I.e. Have some of each, and when the time comes, hopefully have enough time to shift from ETF's and pool accounts of bullion, into hard bullion & coins -- which to take into personal possession and safeguard... somewhere?
George
Posted at 2012-09-25 00:34:50
The authors and those who have commented have a far too benign view of the ending of this fiat system.
There are a number of possible ending scenarios, but all of them are far worse than anything contemplated here, and no one has pursued the logic of the situation far enough, nor is anyone nearly sufficiently concerned.
Fred
Posted at 2012-09-25 01:36:21
Oh I agree with you George. While I'm taking numerous 'Prepper" measures for my family, I did not want to sound too alarmist -- lest one gets labeled with the 'Leper' brand as a "Conspiracy Theorist", or worse. ;-)
"Just for grins" I've penciled out 2 large "Decision Trees" of probable events. One tree leads to chaos (i.e. less Gov control) when TSHTF, and the other leads to a NWO (New World Order, i.e. a LOT more Gov control). That way, as things begin to unfold, this 'live tool' will hopefully provide more insight and practical use (as a roadmap?) for course adjustments, than having nothing but the lastest opinion poll.
You? What basic scenario/outcome do you see?

Gene Braeger
Posted at 2012-09-25 01:25:51
You're wrong George. Wrong on all counts. You may accurately say that the views expressed are benign, and the end of the system will be far worse than alluded too here. That's o.k.. However you are inaccurate to say, absolutely wrong to say the the "view' and what is "contemplated," that "no one has pursued the logic . . .," and, "nor is anyone nearly sufficiently concerned." George, this is bad thinking and I suspect you do it all of the time and I certainly don't want to try and change you. The fact is that you don't know what the "view" is of the commentators. You don't know what they are "contemplating." You don't know how far any of us "has pursued the logic." Nor can you know how much we are "concerned." If you have something to say, say it. Don't simply criticize. What is your view of the ending? How bad will it get? What are some of the ending scenarios you envision. Show us your logic. Exactly how concerned are you?




Hucklebuck
Posted at 2012-09-24 18:40:48
I would dispute your closing comment, but only mildly, regarding ETFs in since that they are not all the same or of equal reliability. While after having read the prospectus I wouldn't touch GLD/SLV with a ten foot pole, the Sprott funds appear to be more reliably constituted. Additionally, for some of us trapped in certain government regulated retirement funds, e.g., Keogh, which do not allow ownership of physical, ETFs represent one of the few viable vehicles for ownership. Having said all that, I agree whole heartedly with the gist of your article.
Reply to comment