Hey Chuck. Not me. He he. I never fell for that scam. Not like the majority of scientists. .... they couldn’t afford to be seen unconcerned. Now they can’t afford to be seen as dupes. So much for the age of the individual.

I know that consensus or the lack of it could be important from the political reason, but this type of surveys are not part of the scientific method.

And since I have been arguing with similar surveys with the AGW crowd in the past I have to say again here that this type of surveys are irrelevant from the scientific perspective also when that support AGW sceptics.

Luckily for sceptics, there is plenty of published papers about hypotheses alternative to AGW. So we could easily use them to prove that AGW is only one of many working hypotheses and the thing like “scientific consensus on AGW” is plain lie.

AGW believers still haven’t been able to provide scientific evidence that introduction of ETS tax will have any effect on the global temperature and I think it is good to remember this simple fact when someone call for ETS as “an action on climate change”

Yep. The greatest scientific fraud in history; swallowed hook line and sinker by thickos and twits. I just pray that, unlike following the fall of the Soviet Union, the swindlers & collaborators pay the price, and the useful idiots learn a valuable lesson. I don’t hold much hope.

But the scientists in the ippc report rigged the peer review ,changed the reports after the rigged review and faked the temps ,that doesnt add up to anything like real science ,blaming humans for weather chsnges,ive never heard of anything so rediculous in my life ,the climate has always changed ,and do you notice they never once mentioned the frauds ,as biased as ever ,even if the temps rose 5 degrees its not going to be that all over the earth ,the temps even differ between suburbs, states and counries no matter what the temp is ,the poles are always around minus or colder ,they will always have 6 mths dark so will always be freezing ,c02 does not make them warmer ,according to you lot if co2 was a million times more than now you say it would melt well thats false ,c02 is still the same no matter if its winter or summer and its always been that way even before humans ,sorry dudes your busted .those emails and code tell us all .Its not about that, its about the treaties which of course they wont mention eu agenda 21, and Brigalow Corp .you have been lying to us all along.

What”, you get caught scamming then you want to argue the science ,forget it ,shows over ,you are frauds.

That’s a pretty misleading headline Andrew.

Dear Andrew,
There was an interesting doco on the ABC on Tuesday night 26 Jan about the sudden fall of ancient Egypt around 2100 BC. The Old Kingdom that built the pyramids suddenly disappeared.  Investigating archaeologists discovered it was due to a climatic event of drought which rendered the Nile delta almost waterless for a generation.  Now my question has to be - was this due to man-made interference with the climate back in 2100 BC?  Did they have factories spewing out pollutants back then?  Perhaps they had too many cattle.  All that methane gas you know…

Regards
Elizabeth

London to a brick, our BoM’s Dick Whitaker would be one meteorologist who would be encouraged by that survey.

My impression is that Dick gives consistently lucid and objective weather analyses on TV and radio.  He refuses to be drawn on dumb questions about man-made global warming or scary weather “extremes”.  He talks facts.  He may well have an opinion on hypothetical dogma, but you wouldn’t know it. 

He’s a professional.  A scientist worthy of the name.

The obvious reason is that they feel secure in their jobs, and don’t depend on government money.
Like most sceptics.

Bob Dylan got it right. The answer my friend is blowing in the (meteorological) wind.

This stinking farcical lie, AGW, is dying a rather fast death.

Allow me to repeat my prediction from around the middle of last year - that “12 months from now the great big global warming racket would be finished”.

It was always too exaggerated and promoted far too fanatically by the media/enterntainer/activist class to convince those who really needed convincing - the average Joes.

And it’s ultimately impossible to sustain a lie when time allows evidence to prove you wrong.

Good riddance.

I must say i do enjoy seeing the IPCC house of cards begin to tumble.

The accounting that is due the main protagonists in this scam will be particularly delightful. (yes al, rachendra, flannners etc, i’m looking at you)

Time for pudding i think. 

Here’s another scandal FOI Scandal

I watched O’Brien interview Rudd, or Rudd interview O’Brien just this time past. O’Brien, as we all know, poses as an intellect. Some people actually think that he is (An intellect)

In keeping with the three wise monkey principle, O’Brien has as you know, engaged in a huge diversionary campaign centered on the massive growth targets of our population, foreshadowed by Rudd.

In this evenings “interview” there was no mention of “Global Warming” or Copenhagen. You, of all people would not find that a surprise.

Adding insult, was the re-emergence of Flannery.

Now, one has to really get a grip here. Copenhagen was trumpeted by O’Brien in it’s lead up. He finally gets Rudd on his show, and makes no mention of any note but fluffs around about population growth.

The simple fact of the matter is, the politican who says this is the limit, like 150.000 immigrants a year, then that guy will win the day. Just like Abbott struck out the ETS.

Here’s his chance again. The public will be with him and the “Intellect O’Brien” will be hoist on his own Petard. His own “Masterpiece” of diversionary political tactics uncovered for what it is, another Rudd/O’Brien deflection, making O’Brien and the ABC willing tools of the Ruddites.

Hopefully, just in hope, both the ABC and their Labour mates and mentors, will sink in their own morass of control of the “serious news” of our national broadcaster. I just cant, after years of almost criminal news slanting by O’Brien and the ABC, wait for the day that O’Brien and his fellow political presenters, are shown the door in the name of truth and unbiased reporting and programming.

There must be a way in which like minded individuals sharing my views on the mal-administration of the public owned broadcaster can see that it (The ABC) is brought to account, and that it (The ABC) must....must, adhere to it’s charter of even handed broadcasting. Or, be floated on the Stock Exchange and then run as a commercial entity.

One final thing. If the ABC is owned by the public of Australia, why are the details of O’Brien’s salary suppressed? After all, we pay his wages.

The executives of all public companies, a fair comparison, have to reveal their salary packages.

Enough said.

Tune in tomorrow, when andrew again points out the ways that the scientific community stifles and hides dissent.

Those shonky scientists - there’s no consensus..!

Oh wait - they’re not shonky scientists this time and since most agree there is a consensus?

So how do you decide? Flip a coin?

You know when todays primary aged children hit university it will be those of the left that will be teaching them of the great global warming con and somehow spinning it as it were they, the enlightened ones who exposed it for what it was.

So only one in four broadcasting AMS members also agrees with their official statement on climate change?

“Indeed, strong observational evidence and results from modelling studies indicate that, at least over the last 50 years, human activities are a major contributor to climate change....

...Prudence dictates extreme care in managing our relationship with the only planet known to be capable of sustaining human life.”

And meanwhile, our own BOM has released its statement for 2009 and the last decade. The message is clear - 2009 has been the second hottest year in Australia (2005 is the hottest) since records began in 1920. And more concerning, 2009 finished the decade as being the hottest on record. This continues the upward trend since the 1940s, and every single decade has increased in average temperature since then. Globally the last decade has also been the hottest on record.

And yes, just as the last decadal increase was predicted accurately, this next decade is predicted to be hotter than the last.

It is certainly heartening that the AMS have published the results of the poll and interesting that it was vetted by NOAA.

But Andrew, meteorology is weather, and weather is not climate! Don’t you ever listen to the warmists?