ADVERTISEMENT
ABC News

Drugmakers, Doctors Rake in Billions Battling H1N1 Flu

Swine Flu Is Bad for Victims, But Good for Businesses That Cater to Expanding Market

Font Size
Share this story with friends

Americans are still debating whether to roll up their sleeves for a swine flu shot, but companies have already figured it out: vaccines are good for business.

h1n1
(/ABC News)

Drug companies have sold $1.5 billion worth of swine flu shots, in addition to the $1 billion for seasonal flu they booked earlier this year. These inoculations are part of a much wider and rapidly growing $20 billion global vaccine market.

"The vaccine market is booming," says Bruce Carlson, spokesperson at market research firm Kalorama, which publishes an annual survey of the vaccine industry. "It's an enormous growth area for pharmaceuticals at a time when other areas are not doing so well," he says, noting that the pipeline for more traditional blockbuster drugs such as Lipitor and Nexium has thinned.

As always with pandemic flus, taxpayers are footing the $1.5 billion check for the 250 million swine flu vaccines that the government has ordered so far and will be distributing free to doctors, pharmacies and schools. In addition, Congress has set aside more than $10 billion this year to research flu viruses, monitor H1N1's progress and educate the public about prevention.

Drugmakers pocket most of the revenues from flu sales, with Sanofi-Pasteur, Glaxo Smith Kline and Novartis cornering most of the market.

Related

But some say it's not just drugmakers who stand to benefit. Doctors collect copayments for special office visits to inject shots, and there have been assertions that these doctors actually profit handsomely from these vaccinations.

It is a notion that Dr. Lori Heim, president of the American Academy of Family Practitioners, says is simply not true.

"According to most of the physicians I have talked to, the administration of these vaccines is done for the community's benefit as opposed to anything that helps profit," she says. Heim adds that even though doctors will not have to shell out for the H1N1 vaccine, they will bear the usual costs associated with storage and administering the shots.

"There is an administration fee, for the costs that you can't get reimbursed through Medicare or Medicaid," she says. "This is usually less than, or right at the break-even point."

Still, pharmacies also charge co-payments or full price of about $25 to those without insurance and often make more money if patients end up shopping for other goods.

"Flu shots present a good opportunity to bring new customers into our stores," says Cassie Richardson, spokesperson for SUPERVALU, one of the country's largest supermarket chains. Drawing customers to the back of a store, where pharmacies are often located, offers retailers a chance to pitch products that might otherwise go unnoticed.

Even companies outside of the medical industry are benefiting: the UPS division that delivers vaccines in specially designed containers, for example, has seen a bump in business.

  • 1 |
  • 2 |
  • 3
NEXT >
Next Story: Nest Egg Rebound: Surging Stocks Lift 401(k) Accounts
Comment & Contribute

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.

btw, ABC, I expected better of you. Get your facts straight. Vaccines are well tested, do not cause autism, and do work. You need to be slamming these anti-vaccine woowoo makers into a dark place, not catering to them. When whooping cough, polio, measles and all the other viruses we are keeping at bay return because of people spreading disinformation, it will be people you know, childeren you have, dying, along with everyone else that can't get their vaccines. Like newborns or people with auto-immune. All this mess is already going down in Australia and people are dying. Children are dying because the anti-vaccines nitwits are winning. Nail these guys and nail them hard.
TheRaptor4 1:13 AM
Oh yes, how wrong it is for a company to turn a profit on a vaccine that they invest money, time, and energy into developing. That would be like saying, super markets shouldn't make a profit on food they sell or that all airline companies should offer their seats for free. I mean, really. They aren't making that much overhead on these things. They have employees to pay, business to grow, and research to do and because of the way business work in the US, they can't do it for free. And competition actually keeps costs down and keeps innovation up. They have ever right to sell the product they invent. Funny thing, though.. for as much as they are making (which isn't that much), they would stand to make a whole lot more if they just let everyone get sick and then suddenly produced a cure. Because when you are dying, you'll pay anything. I mean, hospitals used to have entire polio wards, devoted to people who had been paralyzed by polio and could no longer do things for themselves. That includes breathing. Imagine what the cost of keeping one person in iron lungs would be, how much profit that would be for a hospital. Now imagine several hundred people in there. Far, far more money than a few thousand vaccines. And tax payers would be paying to keep these people alive. Instead of doing the right thing in the first place which is to vaccinate and wipe this and other diseases off the face of this planet. Yeah, we evolved with them, but they still kill people. They just don't kill everyone, that's all. But 1 in 8 dying, hey that's good enough. The species can survive that.
TheRaptor4 1:06 AM
Oh yes, how wrong it is for a company to turn a profit on a vaccine that they invest money, time, and energy into developing. That would be like saying, super markets shouldn't make a profit on food they sell or that all airline companies should offer their seats for free. I mean, really. They aren't making that much overhead on these things. They have employees to pay, business to grow, and research to do and because of the way business work in the US, they can't do it for free. And competition actually keeps costs down and keeps innovation up. They have ever right to sell the product they invent. Funny thing, though.. for as much as they are making (which isn't that much), they would stand to make a whole lot more if they just let everyone get sick and then suddenly produced a cure. Because when you are dying, you'll pay anything. I mean, hospitals used to have entire polio wards, devoted to people who had been paralyzed by polio and could no longer do things for themselves. That includes breathing. Imagine what the cost of keeping one person in iron lungs would be, how much profit that would be for a hospital. Now imagine several hundred people in there. Far, far more money than a few thousand vaccines. And tax payers would be paying to keep these people alive. Instead of doing the right thing in the first place which is to vaccinate and wipe this and other diseases off the face of this planet. Yeah, we evolved with them, but they still kill people. They just don't kill everyone, that's all. But 1 in 8 dying (black death), hey that's good enough. The species can survive that.
TheRaptor4 1:06 AM
More Coverage
Watch Video
1 2 3 4 5
Money News

The rising stock market helps lift 401(k) accounts.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Click Here
Video