AETNA Loses Major =
Dental=20
Case
in Fed Court - Is This Their Demise?...
Opinion by Consumer =
Advocate=20
Tim Bolen
Sunday, January =
29th,=20
2006
Late Friday, January 27th, 2006, 10th District Federal =
Court=20
Judge Marcia Krieger handed struggling Aetna Insurance, perhaps =
the=20
biggest legal loss in Aetna's history. And, it was over a =
dental=20
issue. The reverberations will be felt worldwide. This =
case=20
may be one of the two straws to break this company's back. =
I'll tell=20
you about the second straw further into this article.
About 3:00PM,=20
Central Standard time, in Denver, Colorado, Aetna attorneys and =
top=20
management no doubt went into cardiac arrest when a decision in =
the=20
"Cavitat v.=20
Aetna" =
Federal case=20
was announced by the Judge, especially since the decision came =
only one=20
week after Aetna had arrogantly crowed its legal position to its =
customer=20
base in Business Week Magazine. It is not known whether =
Business=20
Week plans to retract its story and apologize to those it=20
named.
In August of=20
2004, a small manufacturer of medical devices, Cavitat Medical=20
Technologies of Denver, Colorado filed suit against Aetna, and =
named as=20
co-conspirators:
Delicensed MD Ste=
phen=20
Barrett, his dubious website "quackwatch.com," =
Robert S.=20
Baratz MD, DDS, PhD, the N=
ational=20
Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF), and a big chunk of the =
organized=20
"=
quackbuster"=20
conspiracy, in Colorado, for "were and are each =
employed or=20
associated with an enterprise, and participated and participates =
in the=20
conduct of the enterprise affairs through a pattern of =
racketeering=20
activity in violation of 18 USAC1962(c) and C.R.S. =
18-17-104(3). =20
Said pattern of activity included and includes, but was and is not =
limited=20
to, the preparation, publication, dissemination and transmittal of =
information by US Mail and by wire through internet websites by =
wire and=20
other media which falsely represented the Plaintiff's product and=20
technology, constituting a violation of 18 USC 1341, 1343, 1347 =
and 1349,=20
and CRS 18-17-103(5)(a)..."
"(1) Publication of =
an=20
Injurious Falsehood, (2) Tortious interference with a =
Prospective=20
Business Advantage, (3) Negligent interference with a Prospective =
Business=20
Advantage, (4) Interference with contract or prospective =
Contractual=20
Relation, (5) Federal and State RICO (18USCA 1961 et seq. =
and C.R.S.=20
18-17-104).
I have a copy of =
the=20
lawsuit on my desk (12 pages), and I LOVE the way it =
reads. I've=20
put a copy=20
on one of my websites. It's a model, as far as I'm =
concerned, of the=20
way a hundred other lawsuits should be filed against the "=
quackbuster"=20
conspiracy, all over North America.
Basically, the=20
lawsuit complains that Bob Jones invented a device called =
CAVITAT=20
which easily finds cavitations in the jawbone long before an x-ray =
can, got that device properly approved by the FDA, started =
selling it=20
all over North America, only to have the q=
uackbuster=20
operation bad-mouth it. Aetna Insurance picked up the q=
uackbuster's=20
commentaries and used them to deny claims for its use, and for =
treatment=20
based upon results of its findings. The q=
uackbusters=20
that wrote the report (Dodes and Schissell) claim to have a dental =
clinic=20
in Forest Hills, New York. They are the mainstay writers for =
Barrett's dubious "dentalwatch.com" website. Dodes =
and=20
Schissell have very questionable credentials.
Scientist Bernard=20
Windham probably explains best why the q=
uackbusters=20
are so eager to kill CAVITAT for their paymasters. Windham =
says=20
"Cavitations are diseased areas in bone under teeth or =
extracted teeth=20
usually caused by lack of adequate blood supply to the area. Tests =
by=20
special equipment (Cavitat) found cavitations in over 90% of =
areas=20
under root canals or extracted wisdom teeth that have been =
tested, and=20
toxins such as anerobic bacteria and other toxics which =
significantly=20
inhibit body enzymatic processes in virtually all cavitations. =
These=20
toxins have been found to have serious systemic health effects in =
many=20
cases, and significant health problems to be related such as =
arthritis,=20
MCS, and CFS. These have been found to be factors along with =
amalgam in=20
serious chronic conditions such as MS, ALS, Alzheimer's, MCS, CFS, =
etc..=20
The problem occurs in extractions that are not cleaned out =
properly after=20
extraction.
Frankly, the American =
Dental System, with the American Dental Association (ADA) at =
the helm,=20
is buried in 100 year old technologies, won't accept anything new, =
and is=20
fighting a losing battle over their promotion of deadly poisonous =
mercury=20
amalgam (they call them "silver") fillings, and =
ultra-dangerous,=20
but highly profitable "Root Canals." The ADA, I hear, =
has=20
lost a second insurance carrier, because of its endorsement of =
certain=20
dental products. And, it is being sued by its former =
insurance=20
carrier for lying to that carrier about the safety of mercury=20
amalgams.
Worse, the ADA, =
isn't telling=20
its membership about its legal problems. A California =
dentist found=20
out the hard way that the ADA won't back those dentists that still =
install=20
mercury amalgams, stating "he should have known how dangerous =
they=20
were..."
The ADA, isn't =
telling its=20
membership about its Public Relations problems, either. =
Mainstream=20
media has picked up on the ADA's plight. The Chicago =
Tribune, a few=20
weeks ago, ran an article titled "Are your teeth =
toxic? =20
The mercury in 'silver' fillings =
would be=20
hazardous waste in a river----yet it's sitting in your=20
mouth..."
Aetna=20
has been in BIG trouble for a while...
Aetna, just a=20
few years ago, according to Baseline magazine, "was losing =
about =20
$1 million dollars a day..." Then John W. Rowe was brought aboard as =
CEO. Rowe=20
made big changes to stop the hemorrhaging. The biggest thing =
was=20
implementation of a new system labeled Executive Management =
Information=20
System (EMIS) designed to replace an old system that Rowe said =
was=20
"using=20
stale information to make actuarial assumptions about what was =
happening=20
in health care."
Again,=20
Baseline says "This=20
performance management system helped Aetna understand where it was =
losing=20
money and what it would have to change to reverse that trend. =
Initially,=20
Aetna returned to profitability by raising its rates and =
deliberately=20
driving away unprofitable customers. But over the past couple of =
years, it=20
has continued to increase profits by whittling away at overhead =
expenses=20
and medical costs."
The=20
"Cavitat v. Aetna" case, though, points out Aetna's reality =
- and=20
the emptiness of their so-called "recovery." The key =
words to=20
the problems brought up in the Cavitat case were in the statement =
above=20
"it has continued to =
increase=20
profits by whittling away at overhead expenses and medical =
costs." =20
It's how=20
they accomplished that increase in profits, that becomes the rub - =
and is=20
the situation that will anger the health industry towards Aetna =
far more=20
than anything else.
So, how=20
DID Aetna do the "whittling?"
The "Cavitat"=20
case uncovered four Aetna secrets, a good many of which are =
revealed in a=20
transcript of a hearing where Aetna tried, unsuccessfully, to =
change the=20
trial to as different Court. They were:
(1) =20
Aetna makes a policy of using known medical/dental =
"quackpots," and=20
"liars for hire" as "medical dental experts" =
evaluating the=20
unsuspecting health professional's choice of testing, diagnosis, =
and=20
treatment of patients for the purpose of denying claims. =
(2) =20
Aetna has a list of legitimate CPT codes that they will NOT pay =
for under=20
ANY circumstances. They do not reveal this to health=20
professionals.
(3) If=20
ANY health professional uses the legitimate CPT codes mentioned =
above in a=20
billing, Aetna puts that health professional on a supposedly=20
"independent" computer "health fraud" list it shares =
with=20
other insurance companies, State licensing agencies, and law =
enforcement -=20
permanently "marking" that unsuspecting health professional =
as a=20
"suspected criminal," nationwide. From that point on =
there is=20
a target on that health professional's heart. The victims =
have no=20
way of knowing, or finding out, that they are listed as a =
"suspected=20
criminal." We suspect that there are over 70,000 health=20
professionals on that list right now.
(4) =20
Worst, is that Aetna uses the State health professional licensing =
boards,=20
and their disciplinary process, to punish health professionals who =
dare to=20
challenge Aetna's payment denial - filing a formal complaint =
against that=20
doctor/dentist forcing them to go through an expensive =
"investigation,"=20
and a State hearing process. Aetna can refer the =
State=20
agency to the supposed independent computer "health fraud" =
list,=20
saying "see, they're already a suspected criminal..." =
The New=20
York State Medical Society ran an article last year claiming that =
not only=20
are insurance companies using, and abusing, the State licensing =
boards=20
over claims, but they are "funding" those investigations =
and=20
prosecutions.
Keep in mind=20
that these policies are not just restricted to those patients =
covered by=20
Aetna. Aetna is the so-called "plan =
administrator" for=20
hundreds of other insurance plans, including some segments of=20
Medicare....
The "Cavitat v. Aetna" case was the beginning of a =
war...
War is not for=20
the timid.
Bob Jones the=20
inventor of "Cavitat"=20
is certainly not timid. He spent years proving his Cavitat =
device=20
had merit - so much merit, he scares the crap out of =
"big =
dentistry." His device, literally, =
tears apart=20
long, and strongly held, beliefs in dentistry. His =
"Cavitat" device shows that =
dentistry's highly=20
profitable "root=20
canal" =
method is, and=20
always has been, an oral cess-pool of bacteria of the worst kind - =
the=20
kind that can, will, and does, literally, stop the human heart =
from=20
beating. His device changes dentistry forever.
The=20
"=
quackusters" are an industry unto =
themselves. =20
It is their job to stop new things in health care. =
Originally=20
started, and funded, by 26 drug companies, they've expanded to =
become the=20
misdirection agency for everything new in health care. They =
get paid=20
to stop, or damage, anything, and everything, that competes with =
the=20
status quo. When something new arrives on the health scene, =
soon=20
you'll see an article about it on delicensed MD Ste=
phen=20
Barrett's dubious website "quackwatch.com." And Barrett, and his sleazy quackpot friends, are =
more than=20
willing to testify against that new thing, claiming to be experts =
at=20
something that, a few days before, they'd never even heard =
of. For a=20
price.
They made the=20
mistake of trying that crap on Bob Jones. They used their =
usual=20
sleazy "bad-mouthing," bringing in two of their lower-level "testifying=20
whores," Dodes=20
and Schissell, from the ludicrous "dentalwatch.com" infamy. Dodes and Schissell wrote a so-called=20
"scientific =
paper," =
which NO peer=20
reviewed JOURNAL would publish, but Barrett put on his website, =
parading=20
it as though it had merit.
Everything=20
would have been fine, because, in the industry, for the most part, =
Barrett, and his cronies have the acceptance of dog doo-doo on =
your=20
shoe. Aetna Insurance, for reasons not yet revealed, =
however, chose=20
to accept q=
uackbuster=20
crap as credible - and chose to republish their statements, with=20
statements of their own, added.
So Bob Jones=20
said "Oh=20
yeah?" And down=20
he went, into central Denver, and plopped himself down in front of =
nationally =
famous civil=20
rights attorney Walter Gerash, and said "Walter, I need your help on =
something..."
And the war=20
began...
Aetna's counter-attack...
Aetna=20
had to have been literally stunned at Cavitat's legal =
assault. For,=20
Cavitat had laid out the situation, in legal, documents, =
flawlessly. =20
To me, there was no "out" for Aetna, They'd done exactly =
what=20
Cavitat said. So, what would their response be?
Well, they did=20
what every multi-billion dollar corporation does when sued by a =
"little=20
guy." They went out of their way to make the case too =
expensive=20
for Cavitat to litigate. Here's what they did:
(1) =20
First, they assigned the case to five separate BIG law firms, all =
of which=20
began to file massive amounts of legal paperwork designed to =
deluge=20
Cavitat's attorneys with work, distracting them from pursuing =
their own=20
case against Aetna.
(2) They=20
subpoenaed every item they could think of, including Cavitat's =
trade=20
secrets, their bank accounts, personal and corporate - and even =
though the=20
court ordered those documents to be "confidential," they =
turned all=20
of that information over to sleazy Ste=
phen=20
Barrett, who put all of it on his dubious website=20
"quackwatch.com."
(3) Then they =
went to=20
every State licensing board and filed formal charges against ALL =
of=20
Cavitat's backers, and expert witnesses, pressuring those =
witnesses to=20
"not testify." This action, of course, was designed =
to cost=20
those Cavitat "expert witnesses" a fortune in personal =
legal fees,=20
and exert stress in their lives. The so-called "expert=20
witness" Aetna used against all of these people was Robert S. =
Baratz=20
MD, DDS, PhD - the current president of the legally defunct =
N=
ational=20
Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF). Baratz was named =
as a=20
co-conspirator in Cavitat's original lawsuit.
(4) Then Aetna =
filed=20
their counter-claim (a counter-lawsuit) stating that Cavitat, all =
of its=20
users, all of its expert witnesses, etc, in essence, were engaged =
in a=20
conspiracy to defraud Aetna insurance, blah, blah, blah... Their =
claim,=20
although poorly written and hard to understand because of its =
almost=20
"ranting" quality, seems to be saying that NICO (Neuralgia =
Induced=20
Cavitational Osteonecrosis) doesn't actually exist - and (insert =
laughter=20
here) is a "fake diagnosis designed to defraud Aetna insurance, =
blah,=20
blah, blah.."
In=20
that complaint they listed some of the who's who of American =
Dentistry,=20
and science, as "conspirators" against them - top people =
from the=20
University system, including the Universities of Texas, Kentucky, =
Ohio,=20
Arizona, etc. The complaint went on and on - even naming one =
of the=20
top authors of Dental textbooks in the US as a =
"conspirator.." =20
(5) =20
Using the "fake" counter-suit described above, Aetna used =
its=20
billions of dollars, its hundreds of attorneys, and its =
connections with=20
State and Federal authorities to begin to harass, en-masse, with=20
subpoenas, demands for depositions and personal information, =
anyone, and=20
everyone connected to Cavitat. Of course, Aetna bragged in court =
that it=20
had listed all of these victims on the so-called "independent =
computer=20
'health fraud' list."
(a) They even began =
to harass me,=20
Tim Bolen, claiming that I was somehow a "conspirator" =
against=20
them. They gave me fifteen (15) paragraphs (insert =
belly-laugh here)=20
in the writing of their cross-complaint. Using that, they =
sent thugs=20
to my daughter's apartment building, physically threatened my =
neighbors,=20
and I've just found out - "subpoenaed my telephone bills" =
without=20
me knowing it. So, if I've called you on the phone within =
the last=20
seven years, and your cat has disappeared recently, your dog has =
been=20
poisoned, there is a bad smell in your yard, or there is someone =
who looks=20
suspiciously like a vampire peering in your windows - call Aetna's =
Customer Service line, and complain.
(6) Bob Jones, =
Cavitat's=20
founder and CEO, believes that Aetna has been illegally =
wiretapping his=20
telephone. I tend to agree with him - they are, and here's =
why I=20
think so. Bob and I, in a telephone conversation we knew, =
for=20
certain, couldn't be wiretapped by Aetna, set a trap for Aetna - =
and they=20
walked right into it. We "invented" =
information, a=20
non-existent bank account, supposedly in the "Bank of =
Laredo." Bob=20
Jones then briefly discussed, with his own attorney, that account =
in the=20
"Bank of Laredo" as though it actually existed. Only =
a few=20
weeks later, Aetna sent a new set of "interrogatories" in =
which was=20
a demand for "all information about the accounts in the Bank of =
Laredo..."
(6) Aetna then =
took=20
their "fake" cross-complaint story to the media. =
First they=20
put the whole thing on Ste=
phen=20
Barrett's goofy "quackwatch.com" website. It's still =
there today=20
- with Barrett's arrogant commentary. Then they went to =
Business=20
Week magazine, where they are a MAJOR advertiser, and got a story =
written=20
making them out to be some kind of hero combating health fraud -=20
especially combating "that evil Bob Jones, Cavitat, blah, blah, =
blah."
But then the Federal Judge stepped in...
10th=20
District Federal Court Judge Marcia Krieger just didn't see the =
amusement=20
in Aetna's tactics, I guess. She took the opportunity to =
take a=20
close look at Aetna's cross-complaint - and decided, last Friday, =
January=20
27th, 2006, to put an end to Aetna's overbearing ploy. You =
can read=20
the Judge's decision by clicking here.
I read a lot=20
of Court documents. So, let me read between the lines, and =
tell you=20
my interpretation of what the Judge really said in her =
decision: She=20
said:
(1) I=20
don't appreciate principals in a case filing "fake"=20
complaints. I expect, in my court, to have documentation =
that=20
substantiates claims, attached to court cases.
(2) I do=20
not approve of "fake" complaints being filed in my Court, =
obviously=20
using my Court as a tool to defame someone under the guise of a =
legal=20
action.
One last thing...
The=20
American public has become wise to the health insurance industry's =
sleazy=20
tactics. A good many health professionals have signs on =
their office=20
doors clearly stating "We DO NOT take=20
insurance..."
But=20
the State of California is going ten steps farther. Senate =
Bill 840,=20
having already passed the State Senate, is heading for a vote in =
the House=20
- where it is expected to pass. SB 840 will eliminate health =
insurance, within California, completely, settling on a State run =
single=20
payer system. The law will make it illegal for Aetna, or any =
other=20
so-called "health insurance company" to do business with =
California's=20
thirty four (34) million inhabitants.
The American=20
health care system is rated by the World Health Organization (WHO) =
as=20
seventy-second (72) in quality, worldwide. Many third-world =
counties=20
rate higher. That same system, the most expensive in the =
world, is=20
rated as the "Number=20
one killer of Americans."
Recently, I began =
seriously=20
investigating the health insurance industry's role in the American =
health=20
care system. I've found that they, far worse than the =
pharmaceutical=20
industry (which is bad enough) are responsible for the decline in =
American=20
health care. Initial reports, not yet backed up by =
government data,=20
show me that out of every dollar spent on health insurance =
premiums, only=20
nine (9) percent of that premium goes to paying claims.
You can't run=20
a health care system on nine (9) percent. Nor can we have a=20
situation where an aging "quackpot" Ste=
phen=20
Barrett, a man formally discredited in the American Court =
System as=20
"biased, and unworthy of credibility," working out of his =
basement=20
in Allentown, Pennsylvania, and his equally ludicrous cronies, can =
decide=20
what health care is going to be available to Americans, and what =
is not=20
going to be available.
Understand,=20
the Judge only dismissed Aetna's counter-claim against Cavitat - =
Cavitat's=20
case against Aetna is going to trial in a few months - with guns =
blazing,=20
so to speak.